Putting private rent before affordable housing and homeownership?

The Montague Review into private rented housing is due to report later this month.

From the trails so far, I’d say the measures it proposes will increase development of homes for market rent. I’m not sure though it’s entirely a good thing.

The recommendations are to:

  • bring forward public land for private rented development,
  • push councils to have planning policy that promotes private rented homes (by waiving requirements to build affordable housing alongside)
  • offer loans and guarantees to support private rented homes

This looks to me like prioritising private rented homes over affordable homes and homes for ownership.

  • Is private rented development really the best use of public land? If the land is not being sold at a market price to the developer, then it is a simple public subsidy for a private industry.
  • Allowing developers of market rent homes to escape affordable housing commitments is a straight forward promotion of market homes over affordable homes. It also disadvantages homes built for ownership – presumably those developments are still expected to contain affordable housing?
  • Loans and guarantees for private rented homes are a good idea, but why just for market rented homes? Affordable housing and housing for ownership are equally in need of finance and are still safe investments.

The government asked the review what would help one part of the housing sector. The recommendations say that by skewing the market and public policy we can build more in that sector. If you wanted to increase the number of homes for sale, social rent, shared ownership, co-operative housing etc. you could replicate each of these measures for that sector and they would work – you’d just be skewing the market towards them instead.

The real questions are: what homes should we build, why and for whom? Then we should set the policies and incentives accordingly. Once again, it is the absence of a strategy.

We’ll see how the government responds in the autumn and it’s preferred housing pecking order.

About these ads
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Putting private rent before affordable housing and homeownership?

  1. Pingback: A blueprint for even fewer affordable homes | Red Brick

  2. Julia says:

    This support for private developments will put vulnerable people at risk with higher rent fees and more cowboy landlords.

    While the UK and London especially need to have more housing across the board the government needs to prioritise social housing and affordable homes. By having programs affordable home ownership it can help create better stability and help to create better community environments.

  3. Anon says:

    Most housing associations have never taken criminality and ASB seriously.

    So I support all private developments.

    It is frustrating for people who have bought brand new appartments, to find their cars have been vandalised and crime going on and bad behaviour.

  4. Anon says:

    Most housing associations have never taken criminality and ASB seriously.

    So I support all private developments.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s