Are 23,000 homes enough for London?

In the details of the government’s affordable housing plans there was a section on the allocation of funding to London. There was no fixed quota, but the paper suggested that it would be in line with past allocations of grant, i.e. London would get 27% of what was available.

 “Under the 2008-11 Programme, London received funding estimated to deliver around 27% of national outputs. The HCA will seek to deliver a similar percentage of outputs from the new programme in London. The final figure will depend on the relative value for money of offers in London and elsewhere”

 If we assume that affordable housing starts will be proportionate to the amount of funding available that means of the (up to) 85,000 new homes being built over the next 4 years, London will build 23,000.

That’s not going to redress the projected collapse of affordable housing in London that Alison Seabeck and Ken Livingstone recently warned of using the HCA’s own figures.

It may be worse than this. Affordable housing is more expensive to build in London, especially larger family homes that Boris Johnson has said will be his priority. They may need more grant per unit to make the finances of new development stack up.

Alternatively, the new affordable rent model does allow housing associations to make far more revenue by increasing rents in London, Increasing ‘affordable’ rents to 80% of market rents represents a very large increase in their income.

But there’s no guarantee that they’ll use that extra revenue to build more new homes in London – many housing associations may choose to build outside of London, where they get more bang for their buck and building is easier.

The future for affordable housing in London looks ever grimmer.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Are 23,000 homes enough for London?

  1. Dan Filson says:

    Housing Associations seem to have little “sense of place” or loyalty to an area they serve. So even one which is named after a defined area – say the north of one West London inner city borough or the north of the adjacent one – may have a mixed portfolio straggling across several. This makes them harder to make accountable – in a sense the very reason they were set up – and this to my mind is a great weakness of the so-called “Housing Association movement”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s