When housing policy was truly ambitious: in memory of William Barnes

Quite by chance, yesterday I came across a copy of a wonderful tribute to William Barnes,
who died in July age 92, written by his son Peter. In my first public sector job, as Housing Research Officer in Camden from 1977, William was my ultimate boss as Director of Housing for the borough, a job he had held since 1971.

It was a different era, when housing policy was truly ambitious and people not only aspired to achieve the end of housing need but believed it was within grasp. I will let
Peter take up the story from the date of William’s appointment as Camden’s Housing Director.

“The challenge was to provide adequate social housing for a rising population of claimants, in a borough already densely populated, while taking account of other residents. My father addressed himself to the challenges with imagination and energy.

First, he set the goal of a ‘comprehensive housing service’ for the whole borough. In other words, he was concerned not just with social tenants but with housing issues for the borough as a whole. Second he pushed for a vigorous programme of redevelopment and rehabilitation of the borough’s housing stock. And third, he pursued a policy of ‘municipalization’, compulsorily purchasing unoccupied houses for conversion into council flats.

This approach was undeniably controversial. Middle class homeowners did not always welcome council tenants living next door. And the price tag was high.

The Thatcher Government, elected in 1979, cut funding for Camden and ordered the sale of council houses. Cuts and sales made a comprehensive housing service untenable and my father resigned.

Nonetheless, in my father’s decade in Camden, he made considerable progress towards his goals. He had professionalized the housing service, recruiting talented graduate staff. He was adding 3,000 new homes a year to the housing stock, and had almost eliminated the housing waiting list. Thousands of families were moved into safer, healthier, more modern accommodation. And municipalisation created mixed communities, limiting the ghettoization of housing between rich and poor, and reducing the need for building bespoke housing estates. Even thirty years on, my father’s work is still discernable in the streets and communities of Camden.”

William Barnes was a life-long pacifist and a conscientious objector during the war, serving on the front line with the Friends Ambulance Unit. He later served in the Ministry of National Insurance when the welfare state was being built, and as Principal Private Secretary to the President of the Board of Trade. Before his career jump into housing, he was the Secretary to the Board that established the London Business School. As a civil servant of the old school, he nevertheless seemed to rub along well with Camden’s Labour councillors: during his time Frank Dobson and Ken Livingstone had stints as leader and chair of housing respectively, and I suspect he quietly shared many of their objectives
if not their style.

The number of homes being provided during William’s time at Camden is almost beyond
imagination now, despite the country being so much richer. William was a modest
and self-effacing man who worked with good committed politicians to build an
extraordinary department that achieved so much, until Thatcher came along. He
demonstrated what could be achieved if the will exists, and I would be delighted if I qualified as one of his ‘talented graduate staff’.

William Peter Ward Barnes, 1919-2011

Tribute by his son Peter, Church of St John the Evangelist, Newtimber.  26 July 2011.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to When housing policy was truly ambitious: in memory of William Barnes

  1. Pingback: Single Aspect's Blog » Blog Archive » Alexandra Road Camden

  2. Pingback: Single Aspect's Blog » Blog Archive » Maiden Lane Estate – Camden

  3. Pingback: Single Aspect's Blog » Blog Archive » Camden housing – Frank Dobson

  4. Bernard Crofton says:

    I remember him very well: as of course I sat in Camden Town Hall for most of his tenure, although working for the London Boroughs Association. We occasionally clashed, and he didn’t like it if his councillors came to talk to me about something, but mostly he was supportive of my work and I his.
    He used to say that his aim was that one day every director of housing in London would be one of his trainees. Certainly he put a lot more into training than any of his contemporaries.
    In summary he was a good man, and I agree with every word of his son’s tribute, except the use of a z in ghettoisation!

    Bernard Crofton

  5. Single Aspect says:

    Frank Dobson has had one or two things to say about that in a Westminster debate 18 months ago on 2/3/2010:-
    “I take this personally because when I was leader of the council we actually bought up 6,000 properties from the private sector to give security of tenure to people and also to be able to let people off the waiting list into the vacant flats and all I can say is if some people think that being in social housing is unpopular I did not receive during that time one single communication by any means from anyone saying they did not want to become a council tenant.”
    Camden Housing – Frank Dobson

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s