A reminder of the key problem

I was critical of Channel Four’s Great British Property Scandal for obscuring the real housing problem: supply of new homes.

The media, along with the government, the house building industry, local authorities, mortgage lenders all share some blame for this. However, it seems to me more and more that these institutions are the wrong targets.

The biggest barrier to new homes is the public – an awkward and uncomfortable fact for housing campaigners because it’s always easier to blame the government, the media and private companies.  

People don’t want new homes to be built anywhere near them. Here’s a quick reminder from a presentation by Ben Page from MORI:


83% of people think there are too few homes for local young people. Only 18% of people believe we need to build more homes (in this case in Essex).

Unless we can convince enough of our fellow citizens that we should build more homes for those who need them and that in doing so we benefit everyone, there will not be the significant change we need.

And at the moment no policy seminars, round-tables, lobbying meetings, think-tank pamphlets show signs of recognising or achieving this.

Could there be a different way forward?

Could the various housing bodies re-orientate their campaigning away from government and policy towards changing minds in communities where new homes could be built? Could the housing charities employ community organisers to run local campaigns and in the process find out what type of development and on what terms people will accept? Could housing associations join them – and perhaps rather than spending quite so much trying to influence political parties, try to influence local communities where they want to build homes?

It would be great to see in the next housing pamphlet produced by a think tank a serious piece of research about how to overcome public opinion against new homes.

The Labour Party too has an important role in doing this.

I read recently that in rural Essex in 1946 the Labour Party conducted a successful campaign among local farmers, labourers and aristocratic landowners convincing them of the advantages of thousands of new homes in a brand new town. Without any legal challenge, a Development Corporation compulsorily purchased 2,588 hectares of Essex countryside and Harlow now houses 80,000 people*.

It can’t be impossible.  


*Though it could still do with a good few extra homes to house them all well.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to A reminder of the key problem

  1. Anonymous says:

    Yes, I would agree we need more houses. However, when you look at the ugly tower blocks of the 1960s and the ugly boxes built by our housing developers. I can understand why there is a great reluctance against new housing developments. I don’t want to see green spaces to be concreted over. And having been to Harlow, it is one big ugly place.

    We need to go to the drawing board. We need to build houses, but jobs within walking/cycling distance. We need to think about climate change. You can be a housing junk, but it is a bit pointless when you ignore climate change or other matters.

    Affordable housing (as in housing associations estates) tend to attract the anti-social behavior and the criminal element. After bad personal experiences, from trouble makers from nearby housing associations. I have real anger, my taxes have gone to build these people new homes, but all I get is their ‘nastiness’. When it comes to housing we should reward ‘good manners’, people who have contributed something to Society (e.g. had a job, but fall on bad times)….

  2. Tim Leunig says:

    Excellent article

  3. I have had very similar experiences – people turn up to object against developments regardless. On one small development of just 12 houses, one guy came to object but then went on to ask me why it was taking so long for us to find his grand-daughter a house. He just could not see the connection at all unless we were prepared to promise to give her one of these houses specifically. But to be fair, the planners usually allow the developments to proceed anyway. I am not convinced that public objection is causing the housing shortage.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s