Is the Government vulnerable politically on bedroom tax?

The bedroom tax: Whose home do you think has too many bedrooms?

For many people the Government’s attacks on housing benefit have been something to do with people getting £100,000 a year from the State to live in the posh bits of London.  David Cameron repeated the point only last week.

Campaigning against this powerful image, repeated endlessly by the Government’s spin machine, has been an uphill task.  But it seems to me that the campaigning is beginning to pay off.  The message is gradually getting through that the HB caps, the overall benefit cap, direct payments, and now the 1% cap on benefit increases, are hitting far more than a few people in central London.  And as more case studies and examples of extreme impacts on families come to light, it is becoming common to hear people say ‘I thought it was about scroungers not people like them’.

The issue that might become the battering ram for opposition to the reforms is the ‘bedroom tax’ on social tenants.  Although causing damage nationally, the impact of the bedroom tax is greatest in the North where ‘having a spare bedroom’ has historically been less of an issue than in the south and London.  Now hundreds of thousands of people are being informed by their landlords that their benefits will be cut in April and the huge effect this will have on families is gradually reaching the media, where the Guardian, the Daily Mirror, and Channel 4 have highlighted some truly appalling cases.  Callous seems a timid kind of word to describe the collective punishment being visited on people who dare to occupy more space than the Government says is allowed.

The National Housing Federation has campaigned brilliantly on this for some time and their briefings and website reports are excellent.  Social landlords up and down the country have been warning their tenants of what is to come and raising the alarm in the media – although some of them could be more vocal on behalf of their tenants than they  have been so far.

So I agree with the drift of the argument put forward by Penny Anderson in the Guardian that the bedroom tax could ‘light the touchpaper of protest’.  She asks if this issue could become the poll tax of today, but that may be going too far because the poll tax affected everyone whereas the bedroom tax is more targeted.  But I do think it could be the issue that forces the Government to retreat as MPs of all parties face constituents in their surgeries that have a very strong case for an additional bedroom above that allowed by the miserable policy, and as tenants realise that they can’t get a transfer to smaller accommodation.

Tories need to be faced with the victims of this policy.  How many will dare do what Lord Freud did on radio and tell a woman whose son is joining the armed forces that she should get a lodger while he is away from home?

And if you only have time to read one article about the bedroom tax and its implications, I recommend this from John Harris in the Guardian.

Update: Or if you have time to read 2, then here is Jules Birch’s brilliantly researched piece on the same theme.  Not sure how he has time to read all that stuff!!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Is the Government vulnerable politically on bedroom tax?

  1. Pingback: Tackling squalor in a strategic way | Red Brick

  2. Stuart jefferson says:

    I agree! It brings into question about several things Human Rights, Discrimanation and targets all those worse off. I will be hit with the bedroom tax costing me £20 a week, i have no complaints in paying it if the same rule applies to all including MP’s and the PM who are paid through taxation for rooms they dont use, just the same as disabled and people who have been made unemployed by companies during the austerity measures this goverment has impossed.
    I cant see how someone who has such a high volume of qualifications can nit work out that saving £500 million as he says, is worth paying out nearly three times more to cover the mistakes made in introducing such a stupid scheme. He said in PMQ’s that 50 million had been set aside to help people in certain circumstances, the papers laid out says its only 30 million! Does he really know what his own party is doing.

  3. MPs, including PM, should be made to restrict their very high personal allowances & subsidies and pay rises should not be more than ordinary people get at work and Downing Street residents should pay market rent for those areas that are for personal use (rather than offices solely for government work) before they cut benefits for disabled, low income workers, etc

  4. David says:

    The combination of the bedroom tax, universal credit and 1% increase in benefits will combine with Council Tax benefit restrictions affecting even more people so Penny Anderson may be right the touch paper of CTB rather than the bedroom tax.

    • The government do not seem to be aware of the interactions between diferent cuts and policies or the overall affect on the people it applies to. Someone needs to do an assessment of the overall impact of all these things put together.

  5. Eleanor Young says:

    I think there should be a special cabinet bedroom tax. They would have to pay a tax for all the spare bedrooms including in all their spare houses.

    • Paul Johnson says:

      Absolutely! Especially seen as the pathetic excuse for a Human who thought up the bedroom tax – Lord Fraud – has 11 spare bedrooms. David Cameron has 5 homes. Buckingham Palace has 240 bedrooms. All of them are exempt from the bedroom tax.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s